View Single Post
  #8  
Old 09-05-2013, 02:09 PM
earlywynnfan's Avatar
earlywynnfan earlywynnfan is offline
Ke.n Su.lik
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,232
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
Michael, if I had to give a definitive answer, no hedging, I would say 'good'.

I'm no Ruth expert, but I also have avoided giving definitive thoughts on Ruth autographs, so there goes nothing.

It would also not surprise me if you showed a photo of the entire ball, and it had a stamp with Selig's name. There are a lot of good Ruth forgers out there, which is why I don't trust any Ruth autographs without 'provenance'.
I think Scott read my mind with this reply!
Reply With Quote