View Single Post
  #39  
Old 09-15-2014, 08:17 PM
bmarlowe1's Avatar
bmarlowe1 bmarlowe1 is offline
Mark
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EVAJOY91 View Post
To all who responded. What i find very disappointing is ....... 5 other photos which was used for photo comparison. They were from 1917, 1918 and 1919. All show the bump on the chin. The nose is exact haircut and eyebrows are a match. I think a good pair of glasses are needed here.
EVAJOY91 - What you don't understand (and perhaps Josh did not realize) is that Huggins & Scott recently hired me to identify faces in an early baseball photo. They didn't hire hire you (nor did they apparently leave to to Josh). Why do you think that is the case? (I'm thinking they may not do it again )

As for the "Fleet Walker" photo mentioned above by Wonka (below far left), lot 237, which not surprisingly also originated with EVAJOY91, http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=190922 - obviously not 19thC uniforms, and more obviously not Walker:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 0 Untitled-1.jpg (53.1 KB, 460 views)
File Type: jpg Fleetwood Walker Syracuse IA 1888c leg 112662i.jpg (41.2 KB, 460 views)
File Type: jpg Fleet Walker amazon.jpg (46.2 KB, 460 views)

Last edited by bmarlowe1; 09-15-2014 at 08:49 PM.
Reply With Quote