Thread: SGC's Response
View Single Post
  #17  
Old 11-30-2006, 11:05 AM
Archive Archive is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 58,359
Default SGC's Response

Posted By: E, Daniel

but I thought SGC was contacted specifically to answer the question, as I have mentioned already, of whether or not wrinkle/crease removal is regarded as alteration. That very specific word, alteration.
Mastro fixes cards in this way because they believe the wider community and SGC would not regard wrinkle removal as altertion, and Doug Allen specifically stated in his post that he would ask SGC for their opinion on this definition.
Have we answered anything at all if we cannot get SGC to detail their stance on this simple question?

daniel

Reply With Quote