View Single Post
  #10  
Old 01-30-2015, 02:34 PM
itjclarke's Avatar
itjclarke itjclarke is offline
I@n Cl@rke
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 2,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Runscott View Post
Goodel's Q&A today was interesting. He made it clear that it was his job to enforce rules, and he also didn't back down in the least about his relationship with Kraft. I think his message to Kraft today was at least as strong as Kraft's was to him. Interestingly, no one asked Goodell about apologizing to Brady and Belichek if they are innocent. His response would have been an equally good message to Kraft, as I'm sure no apology is warranted - investigations either should or shouldn't take place, but a warranted investigation requires no apology, regardless of what is found.
Interesting! I'd be much more interested to keep tabs on this spat, than I am to hear disinterested player (even the cooperative ones) spout cliché after cliché. In the end, Goodell cannot win a battle with Kraft, or the other owners... but it makes me wonder if he's getting pressure from other key (in Roger's world there is definitely a pecking order amongst owners, Jed may be last) owners to go after the Pats.
Reply With Quote