Posted By:
jay behrensI've read some other articles on this case and it should prove interesting. From what I understand, they are going to being siting the Napster ruling as their basis for the claim. They say that if Napster, which was only venue for contacting people, is found liable for the illegal transfer of music, then by that same reasoning, eBay can held accountable for the transfer and sale of fake Tiffany items. Should prove to be very interesting and it makes sense to me. If Napster couldn't hide behind the "we are only a venue connecting people" then why should eBay be able to do it.
Jay
I've just reached Upper Lower Class. I am now officially a babe magnet for poor chicks.