Printing and lithography looks fake to me....
QUOTE=Edwolf1963;1673884]I saw this one a few days ago - 1915 obviously (vs. 1914 claim) - thought it was a reprint given thicker looking paper stock and consistency which (to me) appears more in-line with other reprints. Hard to be sure off two scans ..
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1914-Cracker...gAAOSwPWRZOwte
Thoughts?[/QUOTE]