Posted By:
Jon CanfieldDave,
Thanks for posting those pictures. I spoke with Rob this morning and I was going to give you a call later this evening. Unfortunately, I have been busy at work and unable to call now and I also contacted some of my contacts in the cigarette world (who do not collect baseball related memorabilia) to get everything in order before speaking with you. Rob informed me that you are a very upstanding individual and very trustworthy.
That all being said, here is some information of use:
According to Springer's Handbook of North American Cinderella Stamps (4th edition):
Series of 1910, tax rate $1.25 per M
TA84 through TA90
issued stamps for 5; 8; 10; 15; 20; 50; 100 cigarettes
The author added the following: "The editor will appreciate hearing of any cigarette varieties not listed in this catalogue."
A stamp for 12 cigarettes first listed as Series of 1917.
As you may or may not be aware, Springer's is a bible for revenue stamp collectors. There were 10+ editions published over many decades.
So, your experience brings up an interesting question. I am almost 100% positive a 12 count cigarette pack was not manufactured before 1917. If that is the case, it begs the question as to how a T-206 got into yours. I am, in no way, questioning your integrity. As I stated above, Rob had nothing but praise for you. However, finding a card in that pack goes against what is currently known information for that time period and those revenue stamps. As a collector who likes to focus on cigarette packs and memorabilia, I find this situation of great interest.
It seems to me there are a couple of possibilities:
1.) It may be that Springers is incorrect and the Series of 1910 also had 12 cigarette configurations (however this information has not yet been known).
2.) It may be that Piedmont had a huge stock of of cards left over and continued inserting them into packs beyond the 1909-11 date.
3.) It could be that someone tampered with your pack before it was purchased (as there were rumors of this being done).
4.) There could be other scenarios I have not yet thought of.
Regardless, if there has been any misconception of me questioning your trustworthiness, etc - I can assure you I am not.
Lastly, here is a scan from Springers:
