View Single Post
  #46  
Old 07-31-2010, 09:08 PM
Jim VB's Avatar
Jim VB Jim VB is offline
Jim VB
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankWakefield View Post
3 things...

First, the 1914 cards aren't found rougher because they were available only one at a time in boxes while the 1915 cards were available through the mail... was the 1914 container really a box? True the 1915 cards could be obtained as mentioned on the backs of the 1915 cards, the set for a quarter. But two serious factors about the condition difference, 1914 cards are on what is closer to thick paper than cardstock, the 1915 cards are much thicker / stiffer. And secondly, kids who jumbled them together towards making a set shuffled the cards about, with the 1914 cards going through one extra year of wear and tear. That's why the 1914s are more subject to damage, and are worn more.



1. Lipset's Encyclopedia says "box."

2. Certainly, the difference in paper stock made a big difference.

3. I'm having a hard time buying that much of the difference is due to the fact that one set (1915) is 95 years old but the 1914's are worse because they are 96 years old. I understand what you're saying Frank, but can't believe it's much of a difference.
__________________
Jim Van Brunt

Last edited by Jim VB; 08-01-2010 at 06:50 AM.
Reply With Quote