Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat R
Ted,
Where did I ever mention 17 ?
Patrick
|
In another thread, you posted a diagram that shows 17 cards across your hypothetical sheet. In this thread, you first jump onto 13, then 16, and then 18 cards. So, which is it ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat R
Actually I think they were printed on a few different size sheets but that's just my opinion and your 12 factor is no different. It's a number that only fits in a few places without forcing it to fit.
Patrick
|
Well, I guess we will have to go thru this drill once more............
150 Series
-------------
150-only group = 12 subjects
150/350 series = 144 subjects/12 = 12
350-only series = 204 subjects/12 = 17
------------------
350/460 series = 60 subjects/12 = 5
------------------
Plus, the 6 super-prints (Double-Printed)
460-only series
------------------
Exclusive 12 group = 12 subjects
Printed only with 460 type backs = 36 subjects/12 = 3
Southern Lgrs. = 48 subjects/12 = 4
-----------------
Yes, the
12 factor is my opinion, and it's based on my research from completing 6 - T206 sets (minus the "Big 3") during the past 35 years.
And, as demonstrated in the above analysis, it does not get any closer than this. Every Series (or group) in the T206 set is some factor of 12.
This is not by coincidence, it is in the design.
So, I do not understand where you are coming from with a remark like that ? Unless you are deliberately ignoring (or do not understand) the
inherent mathematical realities in each of the Series in the T206 structure.
TED Z
.