Quote:
Originally Posted by shelly
I agree with what Scott said on the other thread. I find it difficult to understand because the ball is real so are the autographs but when the ball was not real the autographs where still authentic in the eyes of the "finest authenticators in the industry." You can't have it both ways. That is what is preposterous.
|
I think that this was done in response to the other balls being taken down. They are not arguing "the ball is real so the autographs must be" as much as they are saying "we actually did some due diligence (albeit clearly after the fact of posting) with this ball."
We could hope Heritage has learned something from all of this. We could also hope for world peace.