Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon
I politely disagree.
If any TPG knows something isn't real they should state it. They shouldn't leave something like " ? AUT" on the flip. It can be interpreted different ways. They should know this by now. And the "reprint" designation should be reserved for ones they are sure of. If they aren't sure then they should say "Not sure"  ..... I would respect them more for that then what they do now. BTW, Beastmode and I feel the same way.... |
I agree with you, Leon. And this has been discussed before. It's nothing new...
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=221667
This is all the fault of PSA. They either lack the balls or intelligence to label a card for what it really is - a reprint, counterfeit, fake (or whatever term you want to use to describe it). Look at the Wagner (first post in the link just above). Why not just label it for what it is? Why call it questionable authenticity? There is nothing
questionable about it. The term 'questionable' leaves room for hope. Keep drinking that PSA Kool Aid, guys!
As for Brent's listing, I saw the card and I believe it's absolutely authentic.