Posted By:
Mike P.http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5224261917
I ran across this and it is obvious what the problem is but I am curious as to why SGC labeled it the way they did. So if a card is built to have a front of one type and a back of another the card is designated a rebuild under the card designation based on the back? I just found it odd.