1952 Topps 1-310, is it considered complete?
Because of the tough high numbers do you consider 1952 Topps 1-310 Complete (Just the low series) providing you want to stop it at that and are satisfied with that.
If I ever collect this set, thats probably the route I would go. Not so much of the J.Robinson, Campenella, Mantle, but the high number commons, $100 a piece for low grade commons is probably what would turn me off.
For comparison would you be happier and feel like you accomplished something by completing 1-310 in 1952 Topps, or would a 1953, 1954 COMPLETE set be more satisfying to you.
Who here is just going after 1-310 and then calling it complete? In contrast, who is going for 1-407?
__________________
Excellent people to deal with: bnorth, Republicaninmass, obcmac, marcdelpercio, Michael Peich, dougscats, jimivintage, mybuddyinc, Luke, Bocabirdman, ncinin.
|