View Single Post
  #21  
Old 08-29-2017, 06:03 AM
irv's Avatar
irv irv is offline
D@le Irv*n
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,696
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biohazard View Post
The top and bottom borders are, 70-30, 80-20?? Hard to tell but the card looks to be cut on an angle. Looking at the card, the left border seems to taper a bit, from bottom to top. Well, over a decade ago, I submitted a 63 Fleer Koufax which I believed to be a 7 or 8. It came back a 5. I was shocked. I purchased a loupe and notice the imperfect corners and surface scratches that could not be seen with the naked eye. It was a fair grade, tough, but fair.
Like I mentioned, scans don't always tell the whole story, but I have seen, imo, numerous times, way to many inconsistencies.
The way I look at it, which could be off side thinking, is, if a card is such that you need a loupe to see defects, it should grade higher than cards that don't need a loupe.

These cards, for example, which are fairly recently graded, it is easy to see the inconsistencies but they graded higher than Sleater?
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Frank Shea PSA 5.5.jpg (78.8 KB, 77 views)
File Type: jpg Mantle PSA 7.jpg (77.5 KB, 77 views)
Reply With Quote