Quote:
Originally Posted by OLDBILL
Although not very savvy about the T206's, are the scratches just on the backs? If so, is this related to the fact that just the fronts were coated during the lithography process?
|
For both T206s and E90's, the scratches found so far and studied just happen to be on the backs.
They were printed from stones, which weighed a lot being 2-4 inch thick pieces of limestone. A bit of debris could scratch the stone, leaving an area that would now hold ink.
It's probable that the scratched ones were mostly backs for a few reasons,
The back stone got used for a much longer time- as we've seen, on multiple different front sheets.
Being single color, and an ad, the scratches probably didn't merit redoing the whole stone. A scratch creating a line of color on the front might have. (Plus, there were at least 6 front stones)
Not all front problems got fixed, and it's probable that each position can be identified. Generally a scratch will correspond with any flaws found on the front. A real find would be a front with a flaw that doesn't have the scratch on the back. That would mean that that particular exact subject/position was printed both before and after the scratch happened.
Pat would know better, but I don't think any have been found.