Quote:
Originally Posted by Pup6913
I can confirm Barger partial B, White, Rowan, Fisher, and scanlan with Pied 42 so these subjects are possible with AB backs. I do not have any of these in an AB back and believe I won't either because they don't exist. We need confirmed list but just like the Graham thread no one wants to share any info(yes people have contributed but no where near the help I thought). We have at least 10-15 T205 collectors that I know of and many others that do collect them but only 5-6 have anything to contribute where as in t206's you have 100's of guys and so many stupid "variations/errors" it makes my head spin. We as T205 collectors cant get the Doc white PB "no quotes" acknowledged, now the graham blue sig Pied 25, and also the Miller B, D, and B/D, variations. Why would we put all of our hard work out there when realistically no one really cares or wants to contribute to the cause. This is just how I feel.
|
ANDREW
You and Joshua are our T205 guys and I certainly defer to your's and Joshua's expertise. I've been convinced that the subjects that I've referred as the "TOUGH TEN"
in my 1st post here are not found with AMERICAN BEAUTY (AB) backs. My mistake, I mis-read my data that I got back in the 1990's when I was collecting T205's.
Furthermore, I think you'll agree, that the other 10 subjects (that I've referred to as the "SOMEWHAT TOUGH TEN") are indeed found with AB backs. Therefore, I have
re-defined my 1st post here to reflect these differences.
You are absolutely right, there are not enough meaningful T205 threads on Net54. As you know, I am always fascinated with the front/back combos of these T-cards.
I would like to see more of that data with respect to the T205's.
TED Z