Quote:
Originally Posted by toppcat
Is American Card Collector in fact related to the ACC? I have seen it in lists of old hobby mags but the type looks completely different than the one used in the ACC, IMHO.
|
I am still not 100% comfortable with that being a supplement. It makes no sense whatsoever to have a volume and no. on a supplement. None....
That being said there were different names for the supplements I have.....They were called -
1940 - Catalog Supplement
1941 - Catalog Supplement/Catalog Additions and Corrections
1942- Catalog Additions and Corrections
1943 - Catalog Supplement
However, one I have that is a mimeograph for 1955 says-
Further Additions - The Detroit Handbook - June 1955
I know I have more but need to look around some. Stuff is scattered everywhere right now
. The last one I have at hand is from 1960 and says-
First Catalog Additions to 1960 Catalog
I will look around some more soon and see what more I can find. But my first thought above should be taken into account. I have seen 0 additions/supplements/Corrections that say they are a Volume and No., except above. BTW, I am not dissing on the item Jeffrompa showed, just a friendly debate. That is a neat item and certainly worthy of discussion.
regards