I'm all for it Leon.
I've said this before (I believe) - grading companies are 'paper graders'. For the most part it seems they ignore the printing quality or the photo quality. It is a shame.
Funny to see OJs with terrible photo quality get a high grade -
and funny to see other cards with terrible print quality (faded colors / color out of register, etc.) get high grades.
I would much rather the image quality (photo or printed) be considered as important as the paper quality.
How that would work in a numerical system - I have no idea.
__________________
Joe D.
|