I still don't quite get the exclusion attitude.
A good number of the guys on this list are better then many players already in the HOF. Players that have been in the HOF for decades.
It's not like this would be a sudden watering down. It's seems a lot of people want to impose their own strict criteria to an establishment that never held to that criteria to begin with.
Pretty ridiculous calling ballplayers who were Top 5 in their League at their position for the better part of a decade or more as "Just Better Then Average" or "Very Good".
|