Is the reason for thinking there is a Cobb with a Pirate back based on the crossing of the Type 1's ? Just wondering,because if that were the case, what about :
1.) Crandall,New York Nat'l -Type 1,but no Pirate
2.)Ball,Cleveland -Type 1,but no Pirate
3.)Conroy,Washington -Type 1,but no Pirate
4.)Hartsel,Toledo - Type 1,but no Pirate
5.)Latham, N.Y. Nat'l -Type 1,but no Pirate
Anyhow, there are more-just using these as an example.And there seem to be more Pirate backed cards that don't have a Type 1 example,than the other way around.
So,is the theory that there is a Cobb with a Pirate back somewhere out there because there is a Cobb Type 1 ?
Sincerely,Clayton
|