View Single Post
  #54  
Old 12-29-2009, 04:20 PM
Exhibitman's Avatar
Exhibitman Exhibitman is offline
Ad@m W@r$h@w
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Beautiful Downtown Burbank
Posts: 13,217
Default

Actually, Frank, I don't care for OJs; I just don't like the aesthetics.

I don't think the doom and gloom predictors or the endless market rise predictors are accurate. It is just silly to think that the hobby will crater (absent of course a total cratering of everything else) and it is equally silly to think that we will see T206 prices double in real terms over the next five years. We are not likely ever to see a National like the 1991 Anaheim show, nor, frankly, would I want to. The market for new shiny crap is 1/10 of what it was, but I have to question whether it ever should have been so crazy in the first place. I recall setting up with vintage cards at local shows next to guys selling 100-card bricks of Griffey, Sheffield and other hot rookies (Gregg Jeffries anyone?) in the early 1990s and knowing that there was something inherently wrong with the money changing hands on those deals. The only thing I've seen that was comparable was the real estate market in 2006-2007. The bottom line for the hobby is that about 70 million tickets are sold to baseball games every season. I do not see that pool of fans withering away. Some of them will read up on the history of the sport, will discover this site, and will become addicts just like us. I also see lots of collectors younger than me (more it seems every year I age) who haven't hit their peak earning years yet. They'll get there and the hobby will go on. Like those frothy heights, the current doldrums are out of whack and will pass as the economy passes through the rough patch. The same thing happened in the early 1980s. I know I'd be buying more cards at today's prices if I had the cash.

30 years is a long time, relatively speaking. It can be an entire career. Cards have a track record over 30 years of being pretty decent alternative investments. Like anything else, of course, there are some elements that are better than others and some that were just dum [sic] in the first place. The two constants, however, have been rarity and HOFers. Rare cards and memorabilia of the top players trump everything else for security and for return on investment.

As far as the question posed in this thread, in all candor, $5,000 is peanuts for investment purposes. At 10% year over year it would not even reach $90,000 in 30 years. And yes, I will take that ROI every day; my point is that $5,000 isn't going to make anyone rich or break anyone's back (if it might, don't risk it--put it in an insured account), so we're not really talking about big, life-altering money. If I was going to plunk $5K into the card market now without any real expertise in cards, I would look to purchase a variety of top-flight HOFers from rarer issues. I would avoid 'fad' things like rookie cards, modern gimmick cards, and high grade plastic (slabs), simply because of their volatility. I'd probably also take a chunk of the money and buy a Ruth check or a Cobb check if I could find a reasonably priced one. I really don't think you could go wrong with that. Now, if you want to gamble, my bet would be to go to the National and hunt raw cards for slabbing. I have spotted and slabbed some really high end commons over the last few years--nothing like pulling a few top slabs from raw commons to make your investment day--but it requires a good eye for what the graders want (education) and some luck and persistence slogging through piles of crap to get the few gems. I don't really consider that investment, though; more like placing a bet on a number in roulette.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true.

https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/

Or not...

Last edited by Exhibitman; 12-29-2009 at 04:29 PM.
Reply With Quote