T205 Cycle Mathewson - Not a variation by SGC standards
Based on a request to SGC on why the Cycle Mathewson wasn't listed on the Master Registry Set, this was their reply:
Hi Frank,
"We have not added it to the Master Set because all Cycle back Mathewsons come this way so it is more of an uncorrected error rather than a variation, but I will revisit that decision a little more in depth and get back to you if anything changes."
Thank you,
Brian
So based on that response from SGC, if all PB Whites are that way, then it would fall into that same category of the Mathewson (though not necessarily an uncorrected error).
My way of thinking is if it is different than the majority of cards, then it should be classified as a variation and listed accordingly in the registry.
Just my 2 cents.
r/
Frank
|