[Archive]

Posted By: Matt

Perhaps a statistician can weigh in, but I'd think you'd need a survey of hundreds if not thousands to move the margin of error here to be less then 1-2%.

Since the premise is to validate if the % of Cycle Mattys corresponds to the 3% of all Cycles, you would need a minuscule margin of error to come to a conclusion saying that Mattys are more or less scarce then other Cycle backs.