Posted By:
barry arnoldJamie's contention, based on excellent corroborative data, that the numbers tend to support Ted's theory is approaching unassailability methinks.
What is shockingly unclear is the Red Sox situation.As Jamie maintains,'there's still no explanation I know of for why the Red Sox have so few players represented. No Wood, no Hooper, no Duffy Lewis... .' The number for the Red Sox is even lower than the Phillies and A's.
WHY?! I don't think Ted's groundbreaking Caramel theory is
illuminative here. Is it Ted? You rightfully identify the issue as the Boston enigma.
I'm incubating all this---any ideas T206 scholars?
Any more names of folks who didn't get their own cards?!
many thanks for all the efforts,
best,
Barry