Posted By:
Frank WakefieldAbsolutely a fine post, thank you, Jamie.
That written opinion of the trial court in November seems sufficiently contemporary to me, to the Bulger letter. American Tobacco's concern in February could be because Porter's action may well have already been filed, and if not, at least the attorneys would have been exchanging correspondence about it. Porter may not have been the first, but could have been. The 'first' one, whoever it was, might have settled, and word spread so other actions followed.
Fantastic stuff, Thanks!!!