[Archive]

Posted By: Hal Lewis

CURIOUS QUESTION:

Would it make any difference to anyone if the auction house thought that the repairwork was done to the card because the ORIGINAL bottom of the card had been ripped accidentally from the top?

In other words... are there "lesser degrees" of restoration in anyone's mind?

I know that I would be more inclined to buy a card like this one (with full disclosure) if the repairwork was done to RE-attach two pieces that were once together...

and NOT to "morph" two completely different cards into one.


I think maybe the auction house was under the impression that the card had "work" done to it because its bottom portion had been ripped (not COMPLETELY OFF) and needed to be re-attached.

Still something that needed to be disclosed for sure.

But didn't they disclose SOMETHING of this sort before Barry got onto them??

Or was there ZERO disclosure at all?