Posted By:
Peter_SpaethHow do I know Steve is being truthful? How do I know what his motives are? And even if he is being truthful, how do I know his assessment that the card was NM was accurate? And most importantly, how does HE know Brian did anything to it? His sole basis appears to be because PSA graded it NM/MT. The difference between two opinions is enough to convict Brian? So PSA couldn't have had a different opinion of the card? Did Steve identify in any way what was different about the card? No, he said Brian "trimmed, pressed, or altered it" in some way, showing he has no knowledge whatsoever and is just making an inference based on different opinions on the grade. I could go on but you get the point.