Posted By:
leonbtw, I think I have corresponded with Mr.O'keefe before......at any rate..
O'keefe wrote:
*****************
"On Network 54, an Internet vintage card forum, the reaction was mixed. Some collectors were angry that Cobb and Edwards weren't dismissed as crooks.
Others agreed that Cobb and Edwards may be on to something when they say prejudice has played a role in the debate over their card."
***********
So even if you only look at the top part of his blurb, as you could think that maybe, just maybe, the bottom part wasn't intended to mean our board, giving him the benefit of the doubt, there was not one person on this board who thought the "whole" card was real. Not one. It's very public. His statement can't be defended. I am sure there is a legal term for it but it doesn't look to be a "defensable" statement. (there's a stab at it).....