Posted By:
Todd SchultzI appreciate how you have parsed out some differences in the two posts, but will respectfully disagree with your assessment. I find the inital post as far from benign, and I am skeptcial that you are truly "hard-pressed" to find a better way to word an approach to the subject. Both posters' parentheticals were jabs, and I see little difference in one claiming a certain type of collector overpays outrageously while the other suggests the other collector is wasting his money. Maybe it's just semantics, and maybe monsta ratcheted it up with the reference to internet scans, but both posts are cut from the same cloth, IMO. My point is, let the fur fly, controversy is OK and often healthy, just don't squelch the voice that disagrees with yours for speaking his mind.