Posted By:
JoannJosh,
Thx for the encouragement. It can be a bear doing both, depending more on what's going on at work. Fortunately I have a great boss that allows some flexibility, and a job that does not require frequent and/or spontaneous travel. A difference in either case would be a show-stopper.
In terms of this hypo, would it matter whether the PO thing could be proved? Seller breached, he breached. I didn't think it usually mattered much why. (Except for impossibility of K considerations, which now that he has them relisted strongly indicates no impossibility here.)
If there were enough money involved, or the buyer were a lawyer and could process it himself, or if for whatever other reason cost could be diminished, I would at least think it's worth pursuing. Heck, it has more merit than half of what made it to my casebooks!
Joann