[Archive]

Posted By: Steve Katz

Todd - You have your interpretation, I have my interpretation, and of course the jury had their interpretation. In my view, the settlement is what it is and your comments could also be classified as inane speculation. Mr. Miller clearly thought his "reputation" was at stake in this lawsuit, so a worded settlement such as this with your lawyerspeak interpretation that there is "more to this than meets the eye" doesn't make sense. Mr. Miller as I see it, with a statement such as this, has actually soiled his "reputation" by making it known that he couldn't pay his owed debt to PSA and many if not most are going to interpret this as simply an attempt by him to weasel out of this debt via a lawsuit. Unless his attorney fees were less than the $14,000 he gained from that jury verdict, then his attempt failed.