[Archive]

Posted By: petecld

Personally, I think the card is trimmed. If it was just a mis-cut the top border whould be much wider than it is. Can a card be that o/c AND short AND not trimmed.....I doubt it.

If SGC thought the card was mis-cut Lee would (should) have gotten it back ungraded if the rules applied for everyone. But they graded it so why is the responsibility on Lee? It should be on SGC.

Like Leon's experience, I have cards that are oc 100/0 and SGC wouldn't grade them. They are full size and they didn't come back "evidence of trimming" just "mis-cut". How Lee(?) got that one graded and others don't is fodder for another thread I guess.