[Archive]

Posted By: Jay Miller

Jerry---It seems to me that the opinions that people express in this thread relating to their experience with Craik are very relevant. This is not a trial, relating to your particular case, where the board is your jury. You have recounted your dealing with Craik in an attempt to influence the board's thinking about him. Getting other people to relate their experiences with Craik allows board members to make more informed judgements as to his character. I also agree with Jeff that there is no reason to attack Julie or anyone else on the board who express their opinions.