Thread: Feller rookie?
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 02-13-2023, 09:24 AM
Gorditadogg Gorditadogg is offline
Al Stein
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,921
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobC View Post
Because there is no consensus on what the definition of a "rookie" card should be. Many people, often based on a lot of early price guides like the Beckett's, still seem to follow the thinking that a "rookie" card has to be an actual card, so photos, postcards, premiums, stickers, etc., etc. do not count and cannot be true "rookie" cards. Also, many early guides pushed the idea that a true "rookie" card also could only be one available through a nationally distributed set.

And like the '33 Goudey cards being shown as Ruth's "rookie" cards, many of those same early price guides and books would show the '48 Leaf cards as player's "rookie" cards, despite often having numerous other earlier cards and items issued for them, just as you mentioned Feller's '36 and '38 card issues, and other items of his released before his Leaf card. .
I think this is true generally, but it is still perplexing that Goudey is ok for Ruth's "rookie" but not for Feller's.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 38G 264 Feller G.jpg (53.7 KB, 579 views)
Reply With Quote