View Single Post
  #8  
Old 01-08-2023, 02:48 PM
Rad_Hazard's Avatar
Rad_Hazard Rad_Hazard is offline
Jeremy
Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 617
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowman View Post
I wouldn't believe these stories at face value without evidence or more information.
I’m not sure why you wouldn’t believe these stories. PSA is an absolute dumpster fire for consistency in grading and QC.

I’ve had this experience and I have the PSA customer service emails to prove it. I sent an Old Mill T206 Cy Young PSA 1.5 with a ding in the case to PSA for reholdering. This was the response I received (I ended up having them send it back unprocessed because they are incompetent):

The damage is the top right front, slight star ding.

“It has come to our attention your PSA encased card, cert #26118754 - 1909-11 T206 Old Mill Cy Young Clev., Glove Shows was received with a crack on the holder.
Upon re-holdering the card, we will review the card to confirm it meets the current grade 1.5 and it has not been damaged.”

Good riddance PSA, SGC is leagues better anyway.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 4502B1AD-2829-4CE3-9C44-81CFF05D97B5.jpg (184.9 KB, 1340 views)
File Type: jpg DA116D4D-7419-41CC-AFBD-031DC6394437.jpg (187.6 KB, 1328 views)
__________________
⚾️ Successful transactions with: npa589, OhioCardCollector, BaseballChuck, J56baseball, Ben Yourg, helfrich91, oldjudge, tlwise12, inceptus, gfgcom, rhodeskenm, Moonlight Graham
Reply With Quote