Quote:
Originally Posted by G1911
This illogical and absurd argument can be made for pro-choice too. A pro-choice person supports some right to get an aboriton. They do not believe literally everyone for any reason in all issues can make any choice. They still believe in some rule of law. A pro-choice person does not support a right for me to do anything at any time for any reason.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinMike
Fair point.
|
After thinking about it, I realize I was wrong. I shouldn't have said "Fair point."
Believing in having choices and rule of law do not contradict each other. Since you like to point these things out, let me point out to you that that's a false equivalency. You
can believe in freedom of choice and rule of law.
I believe everyone should have any choice for any situation.
That doesn't mean there can't be adverse consequences for certain choices/decisions. Some choices/decisions can result in the restrictions of future choices, i.e., prison.
But you do have me curious. What choice do you think nobody should have, i.e., what choice do you want to take away from everybody?