Quote:
Originally Posted by jhs5120
If there is a problem with the roof of a house, it'll cost tens of thousands to replace. If there is a wax stain removed from a card, it will cost you nothing.
I'm a reasonable person, I don't require a wax stain removed to be disclosed. Some people do.
If I sold a card graded by a TPG, I would find it unreasonable if a buyer came back to me after learning that a wax stain was removed from the card.
|
Gee, would be simpler just to disclose it then, wouldn't it? I also wouldn't care about a wax stain removed by mundane physical means (the old panty hose trick) But the standard is not what you as seller deem reasonable. Also you're creating a strawman here as wax stain removal is nowhere near the issue at hand.
The people who want to play devil's advocate and "what if" games confuse me. We don't need to IMAGINE scenarios and pose hypotheticals. We have plenty of ACTUAL cases to deal with here. Not to cast aspersions but I do wonder at the motives of the people trying to come up with scenarios that skirt the line of fraudulent behavior. To what end are these people engaging in this exercise?