View Single Post
  #22  
Old 01-28-2019, 09:49 AM
petecld petecld is offline
Peter Calderon
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CW View Post
Very interesting theory, Pete, and great insight into the Lajoie card.

I think you may have to make some leaps of faith to try to understand why Hubbell was included in the Sport Kings set and Lajoie was not. It might not have been an "either/or" scenario. Perhaps they had to shorten up the set and Lajoie simply didn't make the cut. We'll probably never know.

Hubbell's inclusion in the Sport Kings set is not much of a stretch when you look at some of the other athletes included in the set. Some of the selections were also in similar, fairly early stages of their careers. And not all of the athletes were titans of their sport like Ruth and Cobb. Some of the hockey selections, while being eventual HOFers, were not exactly what one would consider hockey royalty either.

However, I think it's very plausible that the artwork used on the '33 Goudey Lajoie #106 could very well have been intended for the Sport Kings set. The theory is so intriguing, I had to make a fantasy card based on it. What if?



That is awesome. Thank you CW.

Let's hope we don't see one on eBay as a "Proof"

Peter
Reply With Quote