[Leon]

Originally Posted by DeanH3

I was checking out some D359 Rochester cards and the thought crossed my mind. Why were these not cataloged as blank backed D359's? Both series have A's players with World Series champions 1910 stamped on the from. Just curious. Thanks in advance.

Burdick referred to D359 as they were similar (18) to T208 Cullivan's. Maybe it had to do with the number in the set? Good question. He only mentioned E104 were found with Nadja Play Ball backs or blank backs but didn't say why.