Quote:
Originally Posted by sebie43
Maybe Chesbro is hall worthy. But in that case I would argue Mullin was aswell with a high of 29 wins in 1909, 228-196 career, 2.82 era with 353 of his 428 starts complete games. 6 world series complete games with 1.82 era. I can certainly see the argument for both pitchers inclusion. I just feel Mullin gets forgotten so I gave a few comparisons.
Sebastian
Sent from my SCH-S968C using Tapatalk
|
I agree with your point pertaining Mullin. While I don't put him at the level of Chesbro, I do think he's Hall worthy....I had no idea that his complete game ratio was that high. That would have to rank with some of the greatest pitchers of all time....