Quote:
Originally Posted by T206Collector
Here's an interesting one:
http://legendaryauctions.com/LotDeta...entoryid=70892
Apparently this was the only Lionel Carter auction that was shilled. I very much doubt that Carter himself was involved in the shilling - I doubt this would have been his one auction to choose to shill. I would guess, instead, that Mastro had knowledge of the highest bid and then did this in order to increase the premium.
|
thank you...my point exactly. Some consignors may not have known about their items being shilled. But I'm sure most on this list did.
And how did Mastro determine which auctions got shilled? Did he base it on the bidding activity, relationships, town in which the consignor and shiller lived? Or side agreements he made with each of these individual consignors/shill bidders? I'm sure there are other folks out there who have made arrangements with friends/family to shill bid an auction without Mastro knowing about it. So, this begs the question, "is this list complete?" (for 2007-2009 Mastro auctions).
And yes, the inflated price phenomenon is certainly an issue here that can't be ignored...especially with price transparency sites like VCP.
__________________
...
http://imageevent.com/derekgranger
HOF "Earliest" Collection (Ideal - Indiv): 250/346 (72.3%)
1914 T330-2 Piedmont Art Stamps......: 114/119 (95.8%)
1923 V100 Willard's Chocolate............: 180/180 (100%)