He says "THIS ONE MAY BE THE BEST EXAMPLE OF THIS CARD THAT EXISTS TODAY", and he compares it favorably to the PSA 4 pictured in the listing, but the front of this card looks so scuffed and worn that it would be lucky to get a PSA 1. Does this guy think that only corners matter in grading cards? Is that why he scuffed it so much, to make it "look old", while leaving the corners sharp?
And what's with having the picture of that PSA 4 as part of the listing? I know he says in the description that "The PSA 4, in the last picture is not included in this listing", but that's just shady.
And what on earth is with the title of the listing: "ZACK ZACKARY WHEAT 1914 CRACKER JACK CARD AUTHENTIC 1/1 TOPPS RED #52 BROOKLYN"??? What does Topps have to do with this card, or "1/1", which implies that it's unique???
I know, I'm shooting fish in a barrel here, so I'll stop now.
|