Quote:
Originally Posted by judsonhamlin
And, why not the cheaper 1953 Bartirome instead/as well?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nsaddict
I do find this interesting and wishing you luck. But why not pursue the 53's that can be had for a fraction of the 52's?
|
Because that's the set I'm working on!
Maybe it has to do with the place the 1952 Topps set has in collecting history, and it being Bartirome's rookie card. Although I think the 1953 set is the nicer looking of the two (one of the reasons I started building it in the first place), you can't go wrong either way. Full disclosure, I have his card from the 53 set signed and don't plan on selling.