Quote:
Originally Posted by steve B
Isn't PSA more strict on centering and a bit more lenient on light creases even in groups?
That might explain it.
Personally I'd have given them both 2s, I always understood a creased card as no better than G unless the rest was amazing.
I've sort of benefitted from SGC giving one card of mine that I thought should be a 30 a 40 so I can't complain too much. (Sort of since it's an expensive card I'm not selling so no real benefit yet)
Steve B
|
That's because SGC IMO does a hell of a better, and more consistent job than PSA. Why PSA appears to be the king of grading is beyond my comprehension.
__________________
429/524 Off of the monster 81%
49/76 HOF's 64%
18/20 Overlooked by Cooperstown 90%
22/39 Unique Backs 56%
80/86 Minors 93%
25/48 Southern Leaguers 52%
6/10 Billy Sullivan back run 60%
237PSA / 94 SGC / 98 RAW
Excel spreadsheets only $5
T3, T201, T202, T204, T205, T206, T207, 1914 CJ, 1915 CJ, Topps 1952-1979, and more!!!!
Checklists sold (20)
T205 8/208 3.8%
|