It is about perception, and integrity of the game. IMO, people have at least a slight understanding that the NFL cannot very easily control players' lives off the field and that violence is a societal issue which, while PC demands an unforgiving, who-can-be-the-most outraged response, is often very complicated in its circumstances. People may wish to see nothing but choirboys, role models and medal of honor winners all over the field but, falling short of that, they at least believe and generally insist upon watching something where the flawed humans are engaged in a contest with common equipment and basic rules designed to create an even playing field. They are not necessarily Pollyannaish to think players are not trying to grab an edge, but nonetheless do not look kindly on rules breakers, especially those who show no contrition. If the game isn't fair and square, and if the League doesn't act as if its rules are all that important, there is both disgust and distrust at the game going forward.
My two cents.
__________________
If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other. - Ulysses S. Grant, military commander, 18th US President.
Last edited by nolemmings; 05-09-2015 at 12:54 PM.
|