WOW, Gary, you think someone overpaid for that one? I don't think any previous examples sold for over $30K.........
You're right about the '62's, Todd. I would consider those to be rookie cards as well since Topps' intention was quite obvious there, just added one additional player as compared to later years. This scenario is far different than a 1915 Red Sox team photo or 1906 Detroit team composite issued on postcards with the entire team present. These can still be earliest major league baseball appearances on cards for Ruth and Cobb, just not rookie cards.
Last edited by bcbgcbrcb; 03-16-2015 at 05:33 PM.
|