View Single Post
  #33  
Old 04-24-2013, 09:15 AM
jimivintage's Avatar
jimivintage jimivintage is offline
Jimi
Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,185
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leon View Post
Hey Jimi
I was sort of answering a few questions but did not think you were asking for another section, but as you stated, changing what is there. In order for change to be warranted I think the issue needs to be overwhelming in essence. I don't think this issue of a couple years rises to that. If we really wanted to be technically pre-war then it would be 1920-1938 then 1939 to 1945 (war) and 1946- xx for post war. I just don't see enough need to change it. I do appreciate your (and all members) input and am always open to discussions.
The T206 issue I am just tired of hearing about.
OK, fair enough. And, yes, I realize my years are off on prewar and postwar. LOL Perhaps I should have said something to the effect of what many collectors would consider as the cutoff point for modern versus vintage, but that's a whole other debate.
__________________
Collecting HOF RCs, t206 HOF tough backs, and other cards that look cool.
Member of OBC (Old Baseball Cards), the longest running on-line collecting club www.oldbaseball.com
--–-----------
jimivintage@yahoo.com
Jimi
Reply With Quote