Matt - I don't think so, but the gilded edges mean it was likely a 'standard' size, which might yield more clues as to age. I don't know the standard mount-size year ranges, but Rhys probably does.
To me it's odd that the print was not cut with clean edges, yet is on a gilded-edge mount (disorder and order mixed). Not sure what all that means, other than dating is difficult. It could be an older print re-glued onto a newer mount. The print looks older than the mount to me, but I might have different opinions of either or both if I had it in hand.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+
|