[Fuddjcal]

Originally Posted by thecatspajamas

So where is the middle ground where people can disagree with or advise you regarding your methodology, but not your overall quest?

If you make a post and nobody says anything, it's because they don't want it being discussed. If you make a post and somebody questions you about it, it's because they don't want it being discussed. We're all either in on the conspiracy, or we're in on the conspiracy. You don't leave any opening for anyone to give you advice or correction without being lumped in with the worst of the worst in the hobby.

Surely you can see that there are many who, like you, want to see autographs handled in an accurate, ethical and transparent manner, but take issue with some of the haphazard methods that you have been using to pursue that goal?

How would you suggest that someone should disagree with something in one of your posts without being lumped in with the baddies? Or do you truly consider yourself infallible in your posts, the Pope of Authentication as it were?

+1