Net54baseball.com Forums

Net54baseball.com Forums (http://www.net54baseball.com/index.php)
-   Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions (http://www.net54baseball.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Legendary T-206 Honus Wagner (http://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=119308)

e107collector 01-04-2010 04:47 PM

Legendary T-206 Honus Wagner
 
I got email today showing some of the highlights of Legendary's Feb 2010 auction, but they don't show a picture of the Honus Wagner T-206.

They have a pic of the D322 PSA 5 Wagner, and PSA Authentic T-206 Plank, but they just mention the T-206 Wagner. Does anyone know the grade of the Wagner?

Thanks,
Tony

Bosox Blair 01-05-2010 08:35 PM

Probably already gone...sportscardtheory traded for it already...:D

Cheers,
Blair

e107collector 01-06-2010 04:36 PM

Honus Wagner T-206
 
I contacted Legendary today, and I was told "We don't know what grade the Wagner T-206 is."

I'm not sure what to make of that comment. Thoughts?

Tony

tothrk 01-06-2010 05:33 PM

wagner
 
It's most likely still being restored or refurbished or manufactured or fixed or.....

calvindog 01-06-2010 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by e107collector (Post 773063)
I contacted Legendary today, and I was told "We don't know what grade the Wagner T-206 is."

I'm not sure what to make of that comment. Thoughts?

Tony

So they've got a consignment for a Wagner but don't know what the grade is. Yeah, that's believable. Is there something in the water over there that makes it impossible to tell the truth?

Leon 01-06-2010 05:44 PM

no defense but....
 
Well, I haven't spoken with Doug since the National and they aren't an advertiser....so with that out of the way, is there a chance they have it being graded and don't know the grade? Also, if they sent it in, maybe they were told a grade they aren't comfortable with and are discussing it with another third party grader. Communication is key and they haven't always done that too well.....:eek: ....and I agree, the truth is so easy....

bijoem 01-06-2010 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tothrk (Post 773075)
It's most likely still being restored or refurbished or manufactured or fixed or.....

hahaha. why commit to a number now?

maybe, like the stock market, a real-time ticker is needed for the grades of cards in the auction.

you never know when a grade will tick up.

Jim VB 01-06-2010 05:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 773076)
So they've got a consignment for a Wagner but don't know what the grade is. Yeah, that's believable. Is there something in the water over there that makes it impossible to tell the truth?



Maybe some consignor, who might own two, or three, Wagners, has committed to consign one of them but hasn't decided which one to send in?

That could happen!

calvindog 01-06-2010 05:57 PM

Or someone is attempting to slip a Frankenstein Wagner past a grading company.

Matt 01-06-2010 06:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by e107collector (Post 773063)
I contacted Legendary today, and I was told "We don't know what grade the Wagner T-206 is."

Too funny.

E93 01-06-2010 06:45 PM

When i e-mailed last week inquiring about it, I got a note saying it was not in the office yet.
JimB

bijoem 01-06-2010 06:50 PM

edited out. never mind.

Orioles1954 01-06-2010 08:50 PM

I don't see anything nefarious here, could very well be out at grading.

barrysloate 01-07-2010 04:38 AM

If you send a Wagner out to be graded, wouldn't you know the results within two hours?

calvindog 01-07-2010 05:29 AM

No, I'm sure the owner sent it in by regular mail with the $5, 20 day turnaround service.

barrysloate 01-07-2010 05:49 AM

Right, and in the box where it asks how much do you want the card to be insured, they wrote $75 so they could save on the grading fees.

calvindog 01-07-2010 08:59 AM

And Barry I'm sure that when Mastro/Legendary learned they would be receiving a Wagner for their auction they never bothered to ask the owner what the grade was. Must have slipped their collective mind.

Matt 01-07-2010 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by e107collector (Post 773063)
I contacted Legendary today, and I was told "We don't know what grade the Wagner T-206 is."

Tony - did they say when they expected to know the grade?

ctownboy 01-07-2010 09:11 AM

Maybe Ray Rod, (Thevintagecardexpress2009) the trailer park trash from San Diego, got tired of messing around with people on this board, Craig's List and eBay and decided to screw around with the auction houses.

David

Leon 01-07-2010 09:14 AM

however
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by E93 (Post 773094)
When i e-mailed last week inquiring about it, I got a note saying it was not in the office yet.
JimB

That has never stopped conspiracy theories before, why should it now? I mean, no doubt they have handled some things in not the best fashion (at least to me), but not every single thing they say or do is with criminal/fraudulent intent behind it. :o This board is great at exposing fraud but I just think sometimes we get a bit too carried away. I AM NOT defending anyone and thank goodness they don't advertise here or that too would be a conspiracy... :)

Maybe they should have said what more they knew about the card...such as

"we were told it's in the fr-gd range but won't know until we see it"....or something like that? That would have been a better answer but it's not my business.

teetwoohsix 01-07-2010 09:18 AM

David-that was funny :D

Ray Rod/Edwin/whoever the f%@# he is decides to go for the BIG FISH :D

Maybe someday he will figure out that it pays more to get a job and earn an honest paycheck..............:eek:

bijoem 01-07-2010 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 773211)
I AM NOT defending anyone and thank goodness they don't advertise here or that too would be a conspiracy... :)


Leon -
everyone is a 'potential' advertiser.

so you will never be completely free from the conspiracy theories.

in addition, I was looking at an old film, and I think I may have seen you by the grassy knoll. :D

Leon 01-07-2010 10:04 AM

Hey Joe
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by bijoem (Post 773214)
Leon -
everyone is a 'potential' advertiser.

so you will never be completely free from the conspiracy theories.

in addition, I was looking at an old film, and I think I may have seen you by the grassy knoll. :D

I remember the arguments about the advertising very well, from about 3 yrs ago. It's so difficult to prove/defend what will or won't happen in the future. I can say though, that for the 3 yrs of banners, I have never once protected an advertiser. That being said I was very close to the grassy knoll yesterday. I had a great meeting with a new technology prospect and it was in downtown Dallas, so I was there. I was only 2 mos. old when JFK got shot and hadn't quite learned how to shoot at that time. However, I do remember chewing on a toy pistol once.

Leon 01-07-2010 03:35 PM

voicemail
 
Doug left me a voicemail today and simply said the Wagner is being graded and they don't know what it will be yet. He said he didn't feel it was appropriate to state the grade when they don't know what it is. It's as simple as that.

T206Collector 01-07-2010 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leon (Post 773306)
Doug left me a voicemail today and simply said the Wagner is being graded and they don't know what it will be yet. He said he didn't feel it was appropriate to state the grade when they don't know what it is. It's as simple as that.

A likely story. How can someone leave mail by voice? Doesn't make any sense. Seems really suspicious to me. And how do you know it was even Doug's voice? I suspect it was someone with a pro-Mastro/Legendary agenda just trying to come to the defense of the indefensible.

To quote an old friend of mine on Net54, "Yawn."

calvindog 01-07-2010 05:17 PM

What are the odds that this is the card that is being "graded?"
 
http://www.legendaryauctions.com/Lot...px?lotid=98847

I'll be in Chicago next week on some business...maybe I can stop by Mastro and check the new Wagner out.

Matt 02-10-2010 10:50 AM

The grade drops:
http://www.legendaryauctions.com/Lot...100&category=1

"Disclosure: It must be clarified that, although past restoration has been largely reversed, as described, under no circumstances would a qualified grading service or knowledgeable collector ever deem this card to be anything but a restored or altered example. In no way does our description intend to imply that this collectible should be regarded as anything but an authentic "altered" card."

calvindog 02-10-2010 10:57 AM

Gee, I thought that Doug didn't know what the grade would be? Sure sounds like it was an "Authentic" all the way through. Sure took a long time to figure out that 'grade.'

bijoem 02-10-2010 11:16 AM

I'm not directing this at Legendary.... because I am guessing this was an owner's/consignor's decision....

But - why alter a card, for a second time, to make it look like it did before it was altered the first time?

Altering a card to get it to 'look' like it did before it was altered.....
seems ironic.

teetwoohsix 02-10-2010 11:19 AM

So if I understand correctly,they sent the altered/restored Wagner in to have the restoration work reversed,hoping the card would get at least some type of numerical grade,and when they sent it back in to be reviewed,it came back with the big "A" once again-please correct me if I got that wrong.
Wouldn't some collectors still want this Wagner-since it may cost less to obtain,fill the nearly "unfillable" spot in their collection,and at least know it is an "authentic" card?
I do not desire cards from the T206 set that are deemed authentic,but I may bend on this one :D

e107collector 02-10-2010 11:22 AM

Seems strange??
 
Even tough they are tough cards, it seems wierd that the first 4 lots in the auction are all altered in some way.

Just my opinion.

Tony

Matt 02-10-2010 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by e107collector (Post 781370)
Even tough they are tough cards, it seems wierd that the first 4 lots in the auction are all altered in some way.

Maybe all came from the same consignor?

Anthony S. 02-10-2010 11:28 AM

This may be my favorite sentence of the year. From the item description:

"....decades’-worth of private handling – doubtless incurred during the fulfillment of the card’s role as a prized family heirloom – took a natural toll on sharply cut edges and deeply inked surfaces."

Matt 02-10-2010 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bijoem (Post 781367)
But - why alter a card, for a second time, to make it look like it did before it was altered the first time?

I'd guess it was done to try and get it into a numbered holder.

calvindog 02-10-2010 11:36 AM

Some fraudsters are well-known for buying altered cards (or suspect memorabilia) at reduced prices with the hope that either a grader or the next sucker who buys it will believe it to be un-altered.

bijoem 02-10-2010 11:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt (Post 781374)
I'd guess it was done to try and get it into a numbered holder.


Can any card that was once restored, with honest disclosure, make it into a numbered holder once the restoration was removed?

I wonder what the policy of the grading companies is on that.

scooter729 02-10-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anthony S. (Post 781373)
This may be my favorite sentence of the year. From the item description:

"....decades’-worth of private handling – doubtless incurred during the fulfillment of the card’s role as a prized family heirloom – took a natural toll on sharply cut edges and deeply inked surfaces."

In some auctions, a descriptive sentence like that could add $10K to the final hammer price.

calvindog 02-10-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scooter729 (Post 781379)
In some auctions, a descriptive sentence like that could add $10K to the final hammer price.

Throw in some flowery language and it might bump 50K.

onlychild 02-10-2010 12:31 PM

Quote:

Can any card that was once restored, with honest disclosure, make it into a numbered holder once the restoration was removed?
Yes...absolutely. I have a great example as well, Auth to 3. Sometimes, to remove an alteration, added ink, stock etc, the card would need to be realtered to get a grade...especially higher than a 1.

It may bring up a good debate. Is removing heavy restoration work on a card altering it?

Can't understand this one though, it looked trimmed in the restored state. How could removing the restoration work change that? Seems it would go from Auth to Auth. Perhaps they were hoping for a 1. Realistically could it get any higher?

On a side note, an artist sketch displayed a Leon-looking guy seen in the grassy knoll. Humm...and he lives in Texas? Then again (from sketch) he could be Keyser Soze.

Kevin Saucier
.
.
.

bijoem 02-10-2010 12:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onlychild (Post 781396)
Yes...absolutely. I have a great example as well, Auth to 3. Sometimes, to remove an alteration, added ink, stock etc, the card would need to be realtered to get a grade...especially higher than a 1.

It may bring up a good debate. Is removing heavy restoration work on a card altering it?


Kevin.... when your card was resubmitted - was the prior alteration, and the new 'removing restoration' disclosed?

I have no doubt that grading companies can be fooled.... I am just wondering what their official policy is if all is told to them. If restoration is removed - are graders okay with possibly giving it a number grade?

barrysloate 02-10-2010 12:40 PM

Yes, removing restoration would be a form of altering.

If you gain weight and let out your pants, then lose weight and have them tapered again, you've altered them twice. Doesn't matter which direction you go.

Leon 02-10-2010 12:54 PM

grassy knoll and
 
I was never on the grassy knoll on Dallas. I lived in Houston at the time Kennedy was assasinated. I think I was about 1.

As for this Wagner....at least there is enough of a description that anyone bidding on it knows exactly where it stands today. That is a heck of a lot more than I can say about some other high value cards I have seen sold....best regards

onlychild 02-10-2010 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bijoem (Post 781397)
Kevin.... when your card was resubmitted - was the prior alteration, and the new 'removing restoration' disclosed?

I have no doubt that grading companies can be fooled.... I am just wondering what their official policy is if all is told to them. If restoration is removed - are graders okay with possibly giving it a number grade?

Good question. No it was not disclosed. The restoration (or alteration) was found out by mistake. It was soaking and a rebuilt corner just fell off, this was of course, fascinating. It had already been rejected as evidence of trimming (not by me), if I'm not mistaken. Seems the two edges had been trimmed back (ever so slightly) to accommodate the rebuilt material.

I set aside the rebuilt material, trimmed and reshaped the bottom and side edges as well as and new corner to blend with the missing stock. It was sent in for grading as an experiment and came back a 3. It's currently on my website with a disclosure.

It is my opinion that removing a restoration with nothing else being done, would be in fact, be altering the card once again. I can't imagine that a grading company would think any differently if it were to be disclosed.

Yes, at least there has been full disclosure with the Wagner but I can see where it would raise some other debatable questions.


Kevin Saucier
.
.
.

batsballsbases 02-10-2010 01:48 PM

T206 wagner
 
Its amazing in reading the description I think the 2 best lines are
1) "The item underwent a measure of careful and professional restoration"

2) " The restorers work consisted primarily of inpainting to hide paper loss,subdue creases,and compensate for the erosion of ink pigmantation"

I do give them credit for at least stating in the description that the card is altered but boy an academy award should be given to the writer of this description:eek::eek:or at the very least he should be given 5K on the final hammer price for that prolific style of writing!:D:D Can you say lipstick on a pig.;);)

calvindog 02-10-2010 01:58 PM

I just have one question to ask: what kind of malevolent jackass would screw around and alter a 75K card?

chaddurbin 02-10-2010 02:01 PM

A+ to legendary for being upfront with full disclosure of all the restorations dating back to the 80's...even tho doug wasn't sure of the card's would be grade a month ago.

where can i read the description in case it made into a 1 holder? :rolleyes:

calvindog 02-10-2010 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 773084)
Or someone is attempting to slip a Frankenstein Wagner past a grading company.

Hey, I wonder who guessed this a month ago?

And Leon claimed Doug left a voicemail saying "that the Wagner is being graded and they don't know what it will be yet. He said he didn't feel it was appropriate to state the grade when they don't know what it is."

I thought they knew it was "Authentic"? Isn't that what the item's description says? Why would Doug claim that he didn't know what the grade would be when he apparently knew it before sending it in to PSA?

When you consider Mastro/Legendary/Doug Allen always presume the worst -- and you'll usually be right.

Edited to add: Quan, exactly.

batsballsbases 02-10-2010 02:08 PM

T206 wagner
 
Jeff,
I was going to say the same thing! Why would you do that to one of the grails of the hobby. I believe the card would have done much better without all that work. But I guess the same question could be asked about the Plank! But I guess we can save that story for another day!:D:D

Exhibitman 02-10-2010 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by calvindog (Post 781439)
Hey, I wonder who guessed this a month ago?

And Leon claimed Doug left a voicemail saying "that the Wagner is being graded and they don't know what it will be yet. He said he didn't feel it was appropriate to state the grade when they don't know what it is."

I thought they knew it was "Authentic"? Isn't that what the item's description says? Why would Doug claim that he didn't know what the grade would be when he apparently knew it before sending it in to PSA?

When you consider Mastro/Legendary/Doug Allen always presume the worst -- and you'll usually be right.

Edited to add: Quan, exactly.

Better save that voice mail...I feel a subpoena coming on...

calvindog 02-10-2010 02:19 PM

In the spirit of Mastro/Legendary record retention policy I would expect the voicemail to be 'lost.'


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:30 PM.